Sneaker insider Nick DePaula didn’t hold back when putting Caitlin Clark’s upcoming shoe into perspective. “Definitely, I think this is probably the most anticipated signature shoe since LeBron [James]’s in 2003, so that’s 22 years ago as crazy as that sounds. Obviously LeBron is still going, but when it comes to signature shoes, this is a shoe that everybody’s been looking forward to,” he said on Front Office Sports.
DePaula also explained just how rare it is for Nike’s boardroom to speed things up, adding, “The timeline always is 18 to 24 months. Literally in LeBron’s case and maybe less than a handful of others has there been a rush timeline, so it really is a longer process that Nike likes to take their time with to make sure they get it right.”
Sneaker insider @NickDePaula on Caitlin Clark’s new logo for her signature shoe with Nike:
“We’re going to see a lot of this come to life almost as if it’s a fashion logo.”
Full conversation in Tuesday’s episode of @FOS_Today
pic.twitter.com/Ez96ArJKSo
— Front Office Sports (@FOS) September 3, 2025
Nike unveiled LeBron James’ first signature shoe, the Air Zoom Generation, in 2003, just five months after he officially signed with the brand in May of that year. The design process was unusually fast, with legendary Nike designers like Tinker Hatfield working on a tight timeline to ensure the shoe was ready for LeBron’s highly anticipated rookie season. The result was iconic—LeBron laced up the Air Zoom Generation I for his NBA debut on October 29, 2003, against the Sacramento Kings.
He also pointed to recent examples, like A’ja Wilson’s shoe. “We just had a similar wait with Aja Wilson that felt like a really long process from my perspective too, and it was a full two-year process that fully released this year. So when Caitlin signed last spring in 2024, it was always slotted as a spring 2026 launch to sync with what will be the 30th anniversary WNBA season.”
Reminds us of how Ethan Strauss, sports columnist, suggested that Nike’s delay in releasing Caitlin Clark’s signature shoe was due to prioritizing reigning MVP A’ja Wilson’s sneaker launch, calling it “corporate malpractice” to not capitalize on Clark’s popularity. However, Tanya Hvizdak, Nike’s Vice President of Global Sports Marketing, disagreed with the notion, emphasizing that creating a signature shoe takes time and that the delay was not excessive. Indeed, Nike had to take its time, as the company could not afford any missteps.
Matt Powell had also weighed in, noting that because the women’s basketball shoe market is so small, combined with the overall decline in the men’s performance basketball shoe market, Nike has to get it right. Suggesting an idea, Powell also said that they could create a shoe specifically for Clark and her WNBA career, rather than trying to make a shoe that fits men’s feet too. “Nike is never going to make any of this ($28 million) up in shoe sales. This is all about marketing and being associated with her, and sharing in her success,” Powell said. He added, “Nike could show real leadership in women’s basketball by making a shoe properly shaped for a woman’s foot.”
Well, as they say, haste makes waste, and Nike doesn’t want that. Not with Clark’s influence.
Clark’s shoe alone could be a million-dollar business